Quadruple Increase In CO2 Over East Asia Causes Changes In Both Fast And Slow Cloud

Extreme climate warming has shown to change how cloud cover behaves throughout East Asia (EA). Recent research suggests that in a warmer climate with greater amounts of CO₂ in the atmosphere, slow cloud responses to meteorological mechanisms can cause a cooling effect over certain regions of EA. However, in some areas within Asia, fast cloud responses may have the opposite effect. This new dynamic is concerning to climatologists who are working to better understand how CO₂ and clouds interact.

 “Clouds play an important role in balancing the radiation budget, and they have a large feedback on global warming caused by the increase of greenhouse gases.” said Prof. Hua Zhang, a climate scientist at the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences. “The uncertainty of cloud feedback has the most impact out of all the climate feedbacks.”

Prof. Zhang and her team—a group of researchers from Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Beijing Climate Center have recently published a comprehensive cloud-climate feedback study in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.

“We can obtain the clouds’responses to increased greenhouse gases from climate models and divide the feedback into fast responses with time scales of days to months and slow responses with time scales of years to decades.” continued Dr. Zhang.

In the study, scientists separated fast and slow cloud responses to an abrupt atmospheric CO₂ quadrupling over EA. They used a general circulation model, BCC_AGCM2.0, developed by the China Meteorological Administration to obtain quantitative data.

The study also considers a total cloud response, which contains the following components: the total cloud cover (TCC), low cloud cover (LCC), and high cloud cover (HCC). All of these variables showed an increase north of 40°N and a decrease south of 40°N with the exception of the Tibetan Plateau (TP).

Within the total cloud response, the mean changes of the TCC, LCC, and HCC over EA are –0.74%, +0.38%, and –0.38%, respectively. The fast cloud cover responses are generally opposite of the slow responses. Furthermore, the total responses are dominated by the slow responses, but in the case of the TP, the fast response determines the HCC change.

Under the quadrupled CO₂ warming scenario, the mean net cloud forcing (NCF) over EA is –1.80 Watts per meter squared (W m^–2), indicating a cooling effect alongside a slow cloud response. Scientists suggest that this can partially offset the warming effect caused by quadrupled CO₂ concentrations. That said, the NCF over the TP, south China, and northeast China are –6.74 W m^–2, 6.11 W m^–2, and –7.49 W m^–2, respectively, which can offset or potentially amplify the climate warming effect much more noticeably.

“Studying cloud responses to quadrupled CO₂ over EA provides a better understanding of the changes and effects of clouds under extreme warming in the future,” said Prof. Zhang. “…and our research especially reveals the role of the slow response of clouds.”